The Department of Homeland Security has issued proposed rule changes that will significantly expand requirements under INA §212 for immigrants and nonimmigrants to demonstrate that they have not in the past, and are not likely in the future, to receive public benefits.  The new proposed rules will be published in the Federal Register and then opened for a 60-day public comment period before implementation.

The new rules will directly impact the Affidavit of Support requirement (forms I-134 and I-864) under INA §213A.  Of particular importance is the creation of a subjective ‘totality of circumstances’ test, in addition to new paperwork requirements demonstrating income self-sufficiency, that will very likely translate into increased denial rates for immigrant visas, certain nonimmigrant visas (including student and fiance visas), requests for extensions and changes of nonimmigrant status, and adjustments of status.

The prop0sed rule changes can be read here.  Check back for updates as the immigration legal community works to understand and explain these burdensome new changes on the horizon.

Major changes are pending to the method in which waivers of inadmissibility based on extreme hardship to a U.S. citizen are processed (I-601 applications under INA §212(a)(9)(B)), announced January 6, 2012 by the Department of Homeland Security.  If you have been unlawfully present in the United States for a period greater than six months, and are thus subject to the three or ten-year bar to admission if you leave the country, and you have a spouse or child that is a U.S. citizen, this directly impacts you.

The new rule significantly changes the government’s method of processing and approving I-601 waiver applications, allowing the Department of Homeland Security in the United States to accept and issue provisional approval of I-601 waivers on grounds of unlawful presence while the applicant remains in the United States.  Upon provisional approval by DHS, the applicant could then apply for the immigrant visa at a U.S. consulate abroad without an eternal wait for the waiver.

To be sure, the ‘provisional’ qualifier likely adds an extra layer of review at the U.S. consulate to ensure all immigrant visa qualifications are met (including, importantly, the primary requirement that the U.S. citizen relative would suffer ‘extreme hardship’ due to separation), but the difference in waiting time would likely be weeks compared to years.  Current practice is for the applicant for an I-601 waiver of inadmissibility, if otherwise qualified for permanent residence through a qualifying immediate family relationship, to leave the United States for often two years or more to wait for processing of the waiver by USCIS, and then further review and delay at the U.S. consulate in their home country.

Continue reading »